Hunting and hunting in medieval Aragon

To understand the problem, the game should be divided into three general moments, which would serve, understood as a whole, to determine, in a certain way, what could be conceptualized as hunting . These moments are the creation of hunting 먹튀, the recreation of hunting and, finally, the representation of hunting. Creation would refer to the act itself. The recreation is contextualizing social interaction within the group of hunters, understood as dialogue and communication, and invariably linked with the act of creation and the starting point of collective categorizations. The representations opposes the last step, dependent on the previous two, in which the knowledge, attitudes, opinions, impressions are internalized, on an individual level and in comparison with others, constructing theoretically and symbolizing, forming a notion and attributing values ​​to the action taken , in this way, in the communicative process, make them present. It would not be an end point, on the contrary, it would suppose a retroactive loop that would return to the act of creation and that would model it depending, in this case, on the spatio-temporal context.

A company  has included the dry stone walls in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, and states: These constructions are a testimony of the methods and practices used by the populations from prehistory to modern times, with a view to organize their living and working spaces, making the most of local natural and human resources. Dry stone walls play an essential role in the prevention of landslides, floods and avalanches, in the fight against erosion and desertification of land, in the improvement of biodiversity and in the creation of favorable microclimatic conditions for agriculture. As the Valencia hunters, with points and commas, described it 14 years ago.

One of the most widespread opinions, which would enter into the creation stage , is the affirmation: hunting is hunting . In this sense, one of the opinions most used by hunters coincides with that expressed by one of the hunters when he stated that “I am one of those who consider that hunting is hunting, that is, when I go out to the forest, Copper or see nothing. Another thing is to shoot pieces.  The fact of “killing” goes to a secondary level, it is the ultimate goal but it does not become the main activity. It would be absurd to deny that the majority of hunters seek this end, which is, on the other hand, the one that gives them the greatest satisfaction when completing the cycle that has begun. Many understand, like Ortega, that the hunter kills for having hunted. . And, finally, the day of the hunt will come, we will apply our strategy in the chosen place and we will look for the chosen species, and, probably, the hauls will not coincide with what we had imagined. This is the good thing, because hunting, however much we do, is unpredictable; the piece is torn where it wants, and there are infinite possible sets, even taking an animal in the same place as another, the set will always be different, and its result too